War and Its Effects essays

War and Its Effects essays Flipping through the channels on TV, we are most likely to run over the news of a war going some where on the world. People are always fighting over territory, political ideas, or simply out of faith. It is all this violence that affect us as human beings; we have gotten so used to the image of people being massacred, murdered, and killed in front of our eyes that we see these events without the slightest remorse. Our own children are growing up with the fact that the best way to resolve a problem is to simply go to war. War and violence are making our society crumbled, before we know it we might even destroy the world. After a governmental dispute, a change in ideas, or simple hatred towards nations, a war is engaged. It starts off by sending innocent lives out to war, most of them not knowing that they are going to sacrifice themselves for the cause of their government. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people would die each day due to the war, but does not mean that it always justifies the end? The answer is no, risking innocent lives is not a debatable issue, its simply is wrong. Gang fights, family disputes, and schools getting attacked by gun men. Our children are growing up with these images in every day life. We have gotten so used to violence and we are accepting it. Example, a guy enters a bank, robs the clerk at gun point, and suddenly decides to kill the clerk and takes all the money with him. Its just a scene of a popular game played by thousands of teens across the world. We let our kids experience it first hand, we teach them to like it. Before we know it they are out on the streets fighting, causing acts of violence towards other people. Which starts a cycle of never ending violence. Wouldn't it be nice if we lived in a world of non-violence? Yes, but we don't. We live in a world where children are taking over. They are shooting at school. Why? because of the lack of attention that they are getting ...

Opportunity Cost in Microeconomics

Opportunity Cost in Microeconomics In economics, the opportunity cost is defined as the value of the best-foregone alternative that could have been pursued using the available resources (Pindyck Rubinfeld, 2008). The concept is used in trading activities and it incorporates two other concepts that is the comparative and absolute advantage. The below given scenario can be used to explain the concept more.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Opportunity Cost in Microeconomics specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Potatoes Chickens Michelle 200 50 James 80 40 Michelle’s opportunity cost of producing potatoes From the definition of opportunity cost, Michelle’s opportunity cost of producing 200 pounds of potatoes is 50 chickens. This can be translated into, the opportunity cost of producing one potato or one unit of potatoes is four chickens or four units of chickens. Michelle’s opportunity cost of producing chickens Michelleâ€℠¢s opportunity cost of producing 50 chickens is 200 pounds of potatoes. This is the same as saying the opportunity cost of producing one chicken or one unit of chicken is 0.25 pounds of potatoes or units of potatoes. James’ opportunity cost of producing potatoes The opportunity cost of James for producing 80 units of potatoes is 40 units of chickens. This can be interpreted to say the opportunity cost of producing a single unit of potatoes is two units of chicken. James’ opportunity cost of producing chickens When James decides to devote all his resources to the production of chickens at the expense of potatoes, the opportunity cost of producing 40 units of chickens will be 80 pounds of potatoes. This means the opportunity cost of producing one unit of chicken is two units of potatoes. The person with absolute advantage Absolute advantage happens when a given country or individual specializing in the production of two commodities is more efficient in the production of both as compared to another one specializing in the production of the same (Pindyck Rubinfeld, 2008). In the above case, Michelle has an absolute advantage in the production of both potatoes and chickens since if all the resources were employed she could produce 200 pounds of potatoes as compared to James who could only produce 80 pounds of potatoes. Similarly, the same resources could yield more chickens as compared to James who could yield only 40 chickens.Advertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The person with comparative advantage in the production of potatoes Michelle has a comparative advantage in potatoes production because of her lower opportunity cost of production with respect to James. The person with comparative advantage in chicken production James has a comparative advantage in the production of chicken due to his lower opportunity cost of production with r espect to Micelle. The benefit of specializing in the areas in which both Michelle and James have comparative advantage Assuming the above given scenario has been given exchange rate of 2.5 pounds of potatoes for1 chicken both individuals would benefit. This is because if John produced only chickens and traded the same for potatoes, he would get 100 pounds of potatoes a little bit higher than what he would have produced if he were to devote all his resources to the production of potatoes. Similarly, if Michelle traded her 200 pounds of potatoes for chicken, she would get 80 chickens, which is more than her productive capability. Therefore, it is beneficial for both Michelle and James to specialize in potatoes and chicken production respectively and trade with each other. Importance of opportunity cost concept, absolute and comparative advantages to the nations, societies and individuals The above concepts are applicable in people’s everyday lives. This is because nations hav e varying resource endowment and their production capabilities differ from nation to nation or society to society. Therefore, each should identify the area in which it can produce goods more effectively compared to other nations and then analyzing the prevailing exchange rates, that particular nation should exchange those goods with other nations (Pindyck Rubinfeld, 2008). This will benefit all nations of the world and promote international trade. References Pindyck, R. Rubinfeld, D. (2008). Microeconomics. 7 Ed. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Opportunity Cost in Microeconomics specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More

Current Preparedness Issue Paper Term Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Current Preparedness Issue - Term Paper Example Thus, it is important to analyze how civilian-military coordination to emergencies in our system occurs. Unfortunately, while great strides have been made, the coordination between US civil and military agencies at the local, state and federal level still have many procedural and practical problems during emergencies. Hurricane Katrina was a fracture point that demonstrated widespread failure in the US disaster response system. There was â€Å"widespread confusion on operations, communications, and protocols† (Meyer and Baca, 2010). Blanco, Nagin and FEMA were unable to coordinate properly with each other at the leadership level, with competing and often redundant mandates. There were many other reasons for failure during Katrina, of course, some of which deserve more analysis later: Racism among local officials that led to people being locked in, FEMA becoming a backseat agency after Homeland Security, etc. But what is illustrative for the general disaster response lesson is that the problem was predictably caused by a lack of state participation in the National Response Plan. â€Å"Further demonstrating the lack of any meaningful role by state and local governments in the adoption of the NRP is the fact that the officials who approved the NRP do not include a single non-federal representative. The Department of Education, an entity with no role whatsoever in domestic incident response, is a signatory to the NRP, while FEMA is not. Not one governor or mayor signed it† (Mayer and Baca, 2010). Things have improved since Katrina, but the government should still be preparing for another debacle on that scale in the interim. Levinson and Granot (2002) make clear why military command only is predictably likely to fail by analyzing the case study of Israel. Their disaster response agency, while nominally civilian, is still staffed by former military career men with little experience in civil-military relations. When disasters happened like the 1990 trai n disaster, â€Å"the scenario went along the lines of military thinking and not according to a course-of-business civilian accident†. The case study indicates a few flaws with a purely military approach. First: Military leaders are not used to working with civilian chains of command or lack thereof. Firefighters, EMTs and police do not have as strong a chain of command as the military do, so more respect for individual autonomy is essential. Second: Military leaders tend to respond to disasters by treating them as full-scale operations. They thus tend to overescalate responses, assign too many resources (as if the situation were a battle that must be overwhelmed), and can lead to panic. Third: The focus on hierarchy not only leads to more alienation of civilian personnel, but it also has additional problems. It prevents the coordination of volunteers who are trying to do what they can but may smart at excessive command and control. It alienates those with management skills, both those people with little disaster experience and those with plenty. It can prevent coordination among multiple groups at different levels, especially pushing away NGOs like the Red Cross and religious associations. And in most emergency response agencies, the ground-level people have the most expertise, yet military planning tends to prioritize consulting people with less experience but more clout. In the military, experience at a core task is the key to promotion: In civilian life, there is